Raus and Zulkefli appoinments was constitutional

PUTRAJAYA -- The government has taken the stand that the appointment of former Chief Justice Tun Raus Sharif and former Court of Appeal President Tan Sri Zulkefli Ahmad Makinudin as additional judges was constitutional, the Federal Court was told on Thursday.
Senior federal counsel Suzana Atan, therefore, informed the Federal Court seven-man bench that it (Federal Court) need not give its decision on the constitutional challenge brought by the Malaysian Bar and the Advocates Association of Sarawak (AAS) over the validity of the former top two judges' appointment as the matter was academic since both of them had relinquished their posts in July this year.
“It is still our stand that they (Raus and Zulkefli) were constitutionally appointed,” she said.
Suzana also said that Tan Sri Zaharah Ibrahim was not competent to deliver a ruling on the matter because she was now holding the post of Chief Judge of Malaya and was in a conflict position.
Apart from Justice Zaharah, the bench also comprised Federal Court judges Tan Sri Hasan Lah, Tan Sri Zainun Ali, Tan Sri Ramly Ali, Datuk Seri Balia Yusof Wahi, Tan Sri Aziah Ali and Datuk Alizatul Khair Osman Khairuddin.
Justice Hasan who chaired the bench said the court wanted to seek the parties’ positions today since both Raus and Zulkefli had left the service.
The bench on March 14 this year had reserved the court's decision on the constitutional challenge after hearing submissions from all parties.
The Malaysian Bar and AAS were given the nod by the High Court to refer five constitutional questions to the Federal Court to determine the validity of Raus and Zulkefli's appointment as additional judges to extend their tenure as Chief Justice and Court of Appeal President respectively after they reached their retirement age.

Lawyer Datuk S.Ambiga representing the Malaysian Bar told the court that the Bar took the position that the matter was not academic and it was an important and live issue for the Federal Court to decide.
She also said that Justice Zaharah was competent to make a ruling on the constitutionality of Raus and Zulkefli's appointment as additional judges because she would not benefit from the ruling.
AAS, intervener Muslim Lawyers Association Malaysia and the Sabah Law Society (SLS) who appeared as amicus curiae and lawyer Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla, who is holding watching brief for Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, took the same stand as the Malaysian Bar.
Muslim Lawyers Association counsel Adzly Ab Manas said although the appointment of the two former top judges was constitutional, the association still wanted the court to deliver its judgment as the matter was not academic.
Mohamed Haniff Khatri said judgment on the matter must be delivered by the court for guidance of the present and future government.
After all parties indicated their positions, Justice Hasan said they would decide what to do and adjourned the matter.
In its originating summons filed last year, the Malaysian Bar sought a declaration that Tun Arifin Zakaria's advice as the Chief Justice at the material time, to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong on March 30, last year that Raus and Zulkefli be appointed as additional judges under Article 122(1A) of the Federal Constitution, was unconstitutional and void.
The Malaysian Bar also sought a declaration that Raus and Zulkefli's appointment as chief justice on Aug 4, last year and Court of Appeal President on Sept 28, last year respectively were null and void.
The Kuching High Court also referred to the Federal Court the AAS legal challenge to the appointment of Raus and Zulkefli.
On July 7, last year, the previous government announced that Raus would remain in office for another three years from Aug 4, while Zulkefli would remain in his post for another two years from Sept 28.
Raus and Zulkefli submitted their letters of resignation to the Yang di-Pertuan Agong on June 7 this year and the Yang di-Pertuan Agong had given his assent to their resignation on June 8.
On June 13, the Chief Registrar's Office issued a statement that Raus and Zulkefli would resign on July 31 after completing their judicial duties. -- Bernama

Mahkamah meriah dengan tahanan reman lindungi rumah urut

PUTRAJAYA -- Mahkamah Majistret di sini “meriah” susulan prosiding reman beramai-ramai melibatkan 14 individu termasuk tujuh penjawat awam berkaitan dakwaan memberi dan menerima wang sogokan bagi melindungi premis urut di Kuala Lumpur. Tujuh penjawat awam terbabit ialah tiga anggota polis termasuk seorang ketua balai, seorang pegawai bomba dan tiga petugas Dewan Bandaraya Kuala Lumpur. Mereka berserta tiga lagi orang awam yang disyaki berperanan sebagai ‘runner’ atau utusan dibawa ke mahkamah itu pada kira-kira 10 pagi menaiki bas Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM), menyusuli empat lagi individu dipercayai pemilik premis yang tiba di mahkamah itu kira-kira sejam sebelumnya, menaiki van SPRM. Prosiding reman terhadap kesemua mereka tamat pada kira-kira pukul 1.30 tengah hari denga...

Ancaman obor-obor di Pulau Pinang serius

foto: flick.com GEORGE TOWN -- Kerajaan negeri Pulau Pinang memandang serius kes sengatan obor-obor berbahaya yang mampu menjejaskan aktiviti pelancongan dan sukan air serta laut di negeri ini. Exco Negeri bagi Seni, Budaya dan Warisan Yeoh Soon Hin berkata kerajaan negeri telah memberikan dana berjumlah RM10,000 pada tahun 2017 kepada Pusat Kajian Samudera dan Pantai (CEMACS), Universiti Sains Malaysia untuk mebuat pemantauan taburan dan kepadatan obor-obor berbahaya di perairan Pulau Pinang khususnya di Teluk Bahang, Batu Ferringhi, Tanjung Bungah , Tanjung Tokong dan Pantai Bersih/Robina. "Kajian pemantauan taburan dan kepadatan obor-obor sedang dijalankan bagi tempoh dua tahun yang akan berakhir pada hujung tahun ini. Fenomena obor-obor ini tidak terhad kepada perairan Pulau Pinang tetapi keseluruhan pantai barat termasuk Pulau Langkawi dan Pulau Pangkor. “Peningkatan kes sengatan obor-obor berkemungkinan besar disebabk...

Datuk Seri didakwa menipu RM19 juta

SHAH ALAM -- Seorang ahli perniagaan bergelar 'Datuk Seri' dihadapkan ke Mahkamah Sesyen di sini hari ini atas tiga pertuduhan menipu seorang pengarah urusan membabitkan RM19 juta berhubung siasatan projek terowong dasar laut Pulau Pinang, dua tahun lepas. M. G. Gnanaraja, 38, bagaimanapun mengaku tidak bersalah selepas kesemua pertuduhan terhadapnya dibacakan di hadapan Hakim Rozilah Salleh. Dia didakwa memperdayakan pengarah urusan Consortium Zenith Construction Sdn Bhd untuk mempercayai bahawa dia boleh membantu mangsa menutup siasatan yang dimulakan oleh Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) terhadap mangsa di bawah Akta Pencegahan Wang Haram, Pencegahan Pembiayaan Keganasan dan Hasil Daripada Aktiviti Haram 2001. Sehubungan itu, tertuduh didakwa dengan curangnya mendorong pengarah urusan tersebut menyerahkan kepadanya wang tunai RM4 juta dan RM15 juta melalui transaksi akaun Maybank milik Syarikat Visione Construction Sdn Bhd ke akau...

Paper Buruk

Search This Blog